Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Blog Article
Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, it is also a well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been from the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion could be thought of, however, we've been clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy subject matter on the approval in the competent authority.
“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple dependable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Reasonable grounds are offered to the record to connect the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. However punishment in the alleged offence does not tumble while in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nevertheless discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case with the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even from the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
only to the ground of miscases remanded & only about the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 in the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of these types of person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”
This system, for use by members on the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took read more their request to the appellate court.
Executing a case regulation search can be as easy as getting into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, which includes:
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence and the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed with the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.